Acts Chapter 24

What Happens:

Five days after the Romans whisked Paul away to Caesarea, the high priest Ananias and his entourage arrive in the city. A trial is convened with Ananias, the Roman governor Felix, and Paul all present. The governor lets Ananias’ lawyer Tertullus go first.

Tertullus opens with a grandiloquent speech praising Felix’s “peace and foresight”, his reforms, and floridly acknowledges the Jews’ “profound gratitude” to him. He then explains that Paul has been stirring up riots among Jews all over the world. “He is a ringleader of the Nazarene sect and even tried to desecrate the temple; so we seized him. By examining him yourself you will be able to learn the truth about all these charges we are bringing against him,” Tertullus concludes.

After Tertullus is done, Paul begins his defense. Paul says that 12 days ago he had visited the Temple, after being gone from Jerusalem for several years. “My accusers did not find me arguing with anyone at the temple, or stirring up a crowd in the synagogues or anywhere else in the city,” he says, “and they cannot prove to you the charges they are now making against me. However, I admit that I worship the God of our ancestors as a follower of the Way, which they call a sect. I believe everything that is in accordance with the Law and that is written in the Prophets, and I have the same hope in God as these men themselves have, that there will be a resurrection of both the righteous and the wicked. … [T]hese who are here should state what crime they found in me when I stood before the Sanhedrin – unless it was this one thing I shouted as I stood in their presence: ‘It is concerning the resurrection of the dead that I am on trial before you today.’”

Governor Felix is familiar with “the Way”, i.e. followers of Jesus, and tells Paul he’ll decide his case once the centurion commander comes. In the meantime, Paul is to be kept under guard, but a much looser one, and his friends are allowed to come visit him.

A few days later, Felix and his Jewish wife Drusilla send for Paul, and they talk for a while. Paul explains about his faith in Jesus Christ, and while he’s talking about righteousness, self-control, and “the judgment to come”, Felix gets frightened and sends Paul away, saying he’ll speak with him again later. He hopes that Paul will pay him a bribe, and over the next two years summons Paul frequently to chat. After two years, Felix is replaced by a new governor named Porcius Festus. Felix wants to leave on a popular note with the Jews, so he leaves Paul in prison instead of freeing him.

Commentary:

More Roman-Judeo politics, yay! Except, not. First, it’s really hard to summarize (Tertullus’ ridiculously pompous suck-up speech to the governor strained my summarizing muscle, not to mention my gag reflex), and second, it’s so much like modern-day politics that it kind of makes your head hurt. Paul here is basically a political disaster for Felix: if you release him and the Jews kill him, you’ve just made Paul’s rich, powerful, and pro-Roman family very upset with you, which could sink your career; or, if you release him and he survives, he’s just going to keep stirring up trouble by spouting all this “the Way” nonsense and starting more riots, and Judea is already a tinderbox without adding more sparks to the mix; or, you keep him in jail, which also risks upsetting his family (but less so than if he’s killed), but since he’s a citizen you can’t just lock him away forever, so everybody has to keep thinking of new pretexts to hold him on.

Felix (and the Roman commander back in Jerusalem) have obviously done the political calculus and opted for door number 3, the least risky. Unfortunately this also means that Paul is now a political hot potato that have to keep passing around, because their pretext for keeping him in jail turns out to be… each other. Commander what’s-his-face in Jerusalem passes him on to the governor. The governor says sorry, can’t complete the trial until the commander gets here. The chapter is pretty vague on what happened during the two years of Paul’s imprisonment, but one gets the impression that nothing whatsoever happened and that Paul is basically in limbo until Felix decides to judge or get off the pot.

The part about Felix wanting a bribe fit right in, too. The corruption we see is almost like reading about politics in a third world country. One wonders, if Paul’s family is so rich and influential (as all the evidence thus far indicates they must be), why doesn’t he just pay the bribe? Is paying a bribe morally wrong? What if paying it means that he can get out and help more people learn about Jesus? However, all the foreshadowing (such as Jesus’ appearance last chapter) indicates that at some point he’s going to be going off to Rome. So I guess Paul figures that the next stage of the hot potato game is for the governor to foist him off on the Emperor or some higher level person in Rome, so staying in jail suits his purposes.

The final bit of the chapter says that Felix left Paul in prison as a favor to the Jews, but I think it’s really more of a “screw you” to Paul for not paying the bribe. Why would Felix care about the Jews’ opinion of him if he’s leaving? Also, Paul (well, Luke, since Luke was the one writing all this later) specifically noted that when Paul was telling Felix about righteousness, self-control, and “the judgment to come”, Felix panicked and cut the conversation short. I take this as another hint that Felix is a not-so-good person who fears divine judgment.

Leave a comment

Filed under Acts, New Testament

Acts Chapter 23

What Happens:

The next day, Paul arrives at the Sanhedrin to defend himself in front of the court. When he tells the council of Jewish leaders that he has fulfilled his duty to God in good conscience, the high priest Ananias orders the priests nearby to hit Paul on the mouth. In righteous outrage Paul sputters, “God will strike you, you whitewashed wall! You sit there to judge me according to the law, yet you yourself violate the law by commanding that I be struck!”

The other priests are angry that Paul would insult the high priest, and Paul says that he didn’t know Ananias was the high priest and immediately apologizes, quoting Scripture that says to honor your leaders. Paul knows that some of the Sanhedrin are Pharisees and some are Sadduccees, and announces that he is a Pharisee and that he’s on trial because he believes in the resurrection of the dead. The Pharisees all believe in resurrection (and immediately vote for Paul to be released), and the Sadduccees all devoutly disbelieve in it, and soon the two groups are arguing  about resurrection instead of about Paul. The fight between the Pharisees and Sadduccees gets so heated that the Roman commander sneaks Paul out of the court for his own safety. The next night Jesus visits Paul, and tells him, “Take courage! As you have testified about me in Jerusalem, so you must also testify in Rome.”

The next day, 40 Jews get together and make a pact not to eat or drink until they have killed Paul. They go to the chief priests (presumably the Sadduccees) and tell them all about it, asking the priests to summon Paul back to the court on the pretext that they want more information from him. They plan to kill Paul on his way to the court. Paul’s nephew gets wind of what’s going down, and warns Paul.  The Roman commander decides to assemble a small force of 470 soldiers to whisk Paul away to Caesarea, where the Roman governor is.

The commander writes a letter to the governor:

To His Excellency, Governor Felix:

Greetings.

This man was seized by the Jews and they were about to kill him, but I came with my troops and rescued him, for I had learned that he is a Roman citizen. I wanted to know why they were accusing him, so I brought him to their Sanhedrin. I found that the accusation had to do with questions about their law, but there was no charge against him that deserved death or imprisonment. When I was informed of a plot to be carried out against the man, I sent him to you at once. I also ordered his accusers to present to you their case against him.

The governor says he will hear Paul’s case, and keeps him under guard until his accusers get there.

Commentary:

Ananias is a different high priest than the one who helped the Romans crucify Jesus (Caiaphas). According to wiki, Ananias was high priest from 47 to 52. Paul’s trial probably took place toward the end of his term, because Herod died back in chapter 12, which took place in 44AD, and that’s been a good number of years previous to the current events, based on all the stuff that’s happened in the intervening chapters. Acts started in 33AD (right after Jesus’ ascension), so… 11 years from chapter 1 to chapter 12, then 8 years between chapter 12 and chapter 23 (max). 19 years for the whole book thus far, or 1.2 years per chapter on average.

ANYWAY. Ananias was accused by the Roman governor of fomenting violence, but was acquitted by Emperor Claudius at a trial in Rome. Most of the Jews hated Ananias because of his cozy friendship with the Romans (he was a huge suck up to Claudius, just like the Herods had been), and in 66AD Jewish loyalists killed him and started a war against the Romans. It was the first of three rebellions in a row (in addition to the ones they had previously fought), which finally culminated in the Romans kicking the Jews out of Judea and starting the Diaspora. (wiki)

It was pretty sneaky of Paul to turn the Sanhedrin members against each other like he did. Divide and conquer, as they say (it was especially funny that the Pharisees immediately voted to free him when he claimed he was only on trial for having Pharisee beliefs). He’s tricksy, he is. Also, ninja Jesus makes an appearance. Is he there in the flesh (i.e. physically visiting), or is it just a vision?

What’s the deal with going on a hunger-strike as part of a vow to kill someone? Unless they’re successful basically immediately, their chances of successfully killing Paul while not eating or drinking diminish to zero as their physical condition deteriorates. Yeah, they plan to kill him that very day, but they also have to know that so far in history their strategies have gone as planned, um, never, so there is maybe a teensy chance that today will not be the miracle day that everything goes right for them for the first time. Not to mention that even with their super-optimistic timeline, lack of water will send you reeling within hours, thus interfering with their plan even if everything goes perfectly. Also, they’ll die within a week if they seriously don’t drink anything. This is the worst idea in the entire New Testament so far, seriously.

Also: is it just me, or are the Romans making a huge deal out of what should basically be a non-event? Some Jewish guy gets accused by other Jews of mangling their beliefs, Romans all agree that the dude hasn’t broken any Roman laws (which are the only ones that matter, after all), and that Jews in general are nutters, and you’d think that that would normally be the end of the story and they’d turn him loose. If some anonymous Jewish guy gets shanked by angry countrymen, I don’t really understand why the Romans would care about that. Long story short, you’d think the Romans’ care factor would be zero, but evidently they actually care a lot.

Ok, maybe they’re just trying to enforce Roman law – i.e., that no one gets to carry out the death penalty except the Romans – but if that were the case, they could just arrest a couple of the 40 Jewish would-be assassins, flog or otherwise punish them to send the other Jews a message, and re-iterate in no uncertain terms that the Jews don’t get to execute people anymore. Paul’s involvement with all this would be zero – he’d be released since he hadn’t done anything against the Romans, while the Romans went about strengthening their grip on Jerusalem. The Romans do absolutely nothing like this, so I don’t think enforcing Roman rule is the reason behind the unusual treatment they give Paul.

Or, it could be because Paul is a Roman citizen. As discussed previously, Paul’s citizenship probably derived from his family being rich and powerful, and therefore getting free citizenship from Rome in exchange for being patsies of Rome, post-conquering. So, Paul’s family is almost certainly rich and influential. (Although for some reason we never see any of them, except for the one random nephew in this chapter.) But if Paul’s death would cause problems among the upper class, then that explains why the Roman commander took such special care of him – saving him from the mob a couple of times, and sending a small army to escort him to the governor, and to have his case heard by the governor himself. A normal Jew, i.e. a working-class nobody, who was in Paul’s situation probably would have received the standard treatment of “Hey, you haven’t broken any Roman laws so you’re good. So, bye! And if the other Jews kill you on your way out, sucks to be you.” They can’t do that with Paul, because if the other Jews succeed in killing him, they will anger a rich, influential, and pro-Roman family. So Paul gets to escape death a few times and get extra special care from the Roman leaders.

Leave a comment

Filed under Acts, New Testament

Acts Chapter 22

What Happens:

Paul begins his defense to the roiling crowd. He tells them that he too is a Jew, and although he was born in Tarsus in Asia Minor, he was raised here, in Jerusalem. He explains to them that he was trained by the rabbi Gamaliel, a member of the Great Sanhedrin who is famous for his mastery and reverence of the Law. Paul tells the crowd that he was as fervent with zeal for God as they are today. “I persecuted the followers of [Jesus] to their death,” he says, “arresting both men and women and throwing them into prison, as the high priest and all the Council can themselves testify. I even obtained letters from them to their associates in Damascus, and went there to bring these people as prisoners to Jerusalem to be punished.”

Paul says that on the road to Damascus, a bright light suddenly flashed around him. The light was so bright that he fell from his horse, and then he heard a voice saying, “Saul! Saul! Why do you persecute me?” Confused, Paul had asked the voice who he was. “I am Jesus of Nazareth, whom you are persecuting,” the voice had responded. The voice had commanded Paul to continue on to Damascus, where he would be told “all that he had been assigned to do.” Paul tells everyone how he had to be led by the hand to Damascus because he had been blinded by the light, and when he finally arrived there a Jewish-to-Christian convert named Ananias had healed his eyes. Paul was then baptized, returned to Jerusalem, and was ordered by God to go and preach to the gentiles.

When the crowd hears this part of the story, they stop listening and try to mob him again. They yell at the Roman guards to get rid of him because he isn’t fit to live. A little bemused by the crowd’s unpredictable reactions, the Roman commander brings Paul back to the legion’s barracks, and orders the legionaries to flog and interrogate him.

Paul asks them if it’s legal for them to flog a Roman citizen who hasn’t even been found guilty. Alarmed, the commander asks him if he’s really a citizen, noting that he himself had to pay a lot of money to buy a citizenship. Paul confirms that he is indeed a citizen, and was born one. The commander releases him, and, wanting to find out exactly what crime the Jews are accusing him of, orders the Sanhedrin to convene the next day and for Paul to be there.

Commentary:

To refresh our memories, the Sanhedrin was a religious council/court in Jerusalem, which dealt only with religious questions. Every city had a similar court, but Jerusalem, being the pre-eminent city (as the home of the Temple), also had the pre-eminent court. The Sanhedrin in Jerusalem was called the “Great Sanhedrin” and the courts in the other cities were just plain Sanhedrins. The Great Sanhedrin’s decisions were binding on the others, but not vice versa. The Great Sanhedrin (often referred to throughout the New Testament without the “Great” prefix, presumably for brevity’s sake since no other Sanhedrins are ever mentioned to have to differentiate it from) is basically the religious Supreme Court for the Jews.

Gamaliel was a distinguished rabbi and a leader in the Great Sanhedrin. He had trained under the even more eminent scholar and rabbi Hillel the Elder. Both of these rabbis are still quite famous in Judaism today. On Gamaliel’s death in 50AD (about 10 years before the events of this chapter), it was written, “Since Rabban Gamaliel the Elder died, there has been no more reverence for the law, and purity and piety died out at the same time.” Two of Hillel’s most famous sayings are these: “That which is hateful to you, do not do to your fellow. That is the whole Torah; the rest is the explanation; go and learn.” And: “Whosoever destroys a soul, it is considered as if he destroyed an entire world. And whosoever that saves a life, it is considered as if he saved an entire world.”

Anyway, they were super famous and respected, and Paul having studied under one of them gives him serious street cred in rabbinical circles. However, this street cred proved insufficient to change the mob’s mind, apparently. Although I had to empathize with the Roman commander’s bemusement when the crowd went from rioting, to listening politely, to rioting again.

Re: Paul’s citizenship. We encountered this the last time Paul was imprisoned too, back in chapter 16, where we went through the mechanics of Roman citizenship is pretty thorough detail. The only way to be born a citizen is if you’re born in Italy (the only part of the Empire with blanket citizenship for everyone born there), or if your parents (or more distant ancestors) acquired citizenship in the past and you inherited it. Besides birth in Italy, the only ways to acquire citizenship were service in the Legions (and even then you still have to pay for it apparently, based on the commander’s story here), service to the Emperor/Empire, or by being a rich/influential resident of a newly conquered territory. When the Romans conquered new lands, they liked to schmooze the upper classes, Romanize them, and then use them as puppet-rulers. When Pompey conquered Judea he probably followed the usual pattern and granted citizenship to the Jewish king and the leading Jewish families, including Paul’s. Whereby Paul inherited citizenship, and is now taking full advantage of it.

However, I’m left wondering how anyone would be able to prove their citizenship in Roman times. It’s not like the Romans had a “show me your papers” mentality like in WW2-era Germany. Or did they? When slaves were freed they sometimes got a ring or a paper from their former master saying they were free, so maybe there is something similar for citizens? What happens if you forget your ring at home or your paper gets lost? I guess you’re just screwed? But seriously though, it seems like it would be super easy to game the system and pretend to be a citizen even when you’re not. How would anyone ever know?

Leave a comment

Filed under Acts, New Testament

Acts Chapter 21

What Happens:

Paul, Luke, and their group (Sopater from Berea, Aristarchus and Secundus from Thessalonica, Gaius from Derbe, Timothy, and Tychicus and Trophimus from Ephesus) leave Miletus and sail to Tyre on a cargo ship. Paul and his group link up with the christian community of Tyre and stay with them for seven days. The christians of Tyre feel forebodings from the Holy Spirit, and warn Paul not to go to Jerusalem. Despite the Tyrians’ misgivings, Paul is set on continuing to Jerusalem. When the time comes for him and the others to leave, all the christians of Tyre accompany them to their ship, and they all kneel down and pray together before saying goodbye.

They sail to Ptolemais and stay with the christians there for a day, and the next day sail to Caesarea, where they stay with Philip, one of the seven deacons. Philip has four unmarried daughters who can prophesy. After Paul has been there a few days, a prophet named Agabus comes and takes Paul’s belt and ties his own hands and feet with it. “In this way the Jewish leaders in Jerusalem will bind the owner of this belt and will hand him over to the Gentiles,” he declares. Luke, and Paul’s other friends, anxiously beg Paul not to go, but Paul’s mind is made up. “Why are you weeping and breaking my heart?” he asks them. “I am ready not only to be bound, but also to die in Jerusalem for the name of the Lord Jesus.” Luke and the others give up trying to dissuade him, and go with him to Jerusalem. Some of the Caesarean followers come with them also, and take them to the house of a man named Mnason in Jerusalem, who had been one of the earliest converts.

The christian community of Jerusalem greets Paul and the others warmly, and Paul goes to visit James. He tells James and the city’s elders about everything he’s been doing since his last visit. The elders are very happy about all the progress Paul has been making in Greece and Asia Minor, but are concerned about some of the Jewish converts here in Jerusalem. Peter’s vision from the Holy Spirit (Acts 10) had made clear that Christians no longer have to follow Jewish dietary laws or most other Jewish laws, and a few years ago the Apostles had published a letter saying that the only laws of Moses Christians have to follow are to abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood, from the meat of strangled animals and from sexual immorality. (Acts 15)

But now, the Jews and Jewish converts are saying that Paul is teaching that everyone should “reject” Moses wholesale. They are rejecting not just the law but also customs and traditions. “What shall we do?” they ask Paul worriedly. “They will certainly hear that you have come, so do what we tell you. There are four men with us who have made a vow. Take these men, join in their purification rites and pay their expenses, so that they can have their heads shaved. Then everyone will know there is no truth in these reports about you, but that you yourself are living in obedience to the law. As for the Gentile believers, we have written to them our decision that they should abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood, from the meat of strangled animals and from sexual immorality.” Paul takes their advice, and joins in the purification rites with the men.

When the seven-day purification rites are over, some Jews see Paul at the Temple and start shouting and getting the whole temple crowd riled up. “Fellow Israelites, help us! This is the man who teaches everyone everywhere against our people and our law and this place,” they exclaim. They had also seen Paul with his greek friend Trophimus earlier, and wrongly assume that he had brought him into the Temple with him. This makes them even more enraged as they accuse Paul of “defiling” the Temple by bringing a non-Jew in. The crowd seizes Paul, and the small riot quickly sparks into a large riot, and people come running in from all directions. Soon the whole city is in an uproar.

The commander of the Roman troops sends some soldiers in, and the rioters stop beating Paul when they see them. The commander arrests Paul, but when he asks the crowd what he’s done, everyone shouts different things. He has his soldiers take Paul to the barracks, and the violence of the mob is so great that Paul can’t walk through the crowd, but has to be hoisted up and carried by the soldiers. “Get rid of him!” the crowd chants.

As they are on the way to the barracks, Paul asks the commander if he can speak to him. The commander asks him if he’s the Egyptian who started a revolt and led four thousand rebels out into the desert. Paul tells him that he’s a Jew from Tarsus, “a citizen of no ordinary city”, and asks to be allowed to address the crowd. The commander gives his permission, and Paul prepares to speak to his accusers.

Commentary:

The notes say that the warnings the Tyrians received from the HS warned them about the impending dangers that awaited Paul, and they therefore decided the danger was too great and that Paul shouldn’t go. The HS didn’t directly tell the Tyrians that he shouldn’t go.

Apparently Philip is married, if he has a bunch of daughters. We’ve never met his wife, though. Not sure what the significance is of them being able to prophesy, unless it’s supposed to mean they’re extra holy or something.

We met Agabus back in Acts 11; he predicted a famine under Emperor Claudius which eventually came to pass. It’s probably been a good 10 to 15 years in between Acts 11 and Acts 21.

I assume the James that Paul visits is the Apostle James Alphaeus. (There had originally been another Apostle also named James, but he was executed by King Herod back in Acts 12. I had actually forgotten all about that, and I don’t know if the surviving Apostles ever picked out a replacement for him. They elected a replacement for Judas Iscariot when he died, so I assume they would have picked a replacement for James too. A quick wiki turned up nothing, though.) Anyway, it’s nice to see the Apostles taking an active role again. No doubt they’ve been doing stuff of their own all this time, but since Acts focuses almost solely on Paul’s travels around Greece and Asia Minor, anything happening anywhere else is almost totally unknown. Also, where’s Peter? He’s still the leader of the Apostles, right? So why is Paul reporting to James Alphaeus instead of to him? The last time we saw Peter was back in Acts 15, when (I thought) he laid down the law once and for all that no one has to follow the now-defunct law of Moses anymore, apart from the 4 things specifically mentioned in the Apostles’ letter.

However, I’m STILL not real clear on whether the law of Moses is truly defunct now or not. I thought we had this all settled back in Acts 10, with Peter’s whole vision about most of the law being obsolete now and gentile converts being full members of the church and not just second-class citizens after the Jewish converts. And then we had Acts 15, where all the Apostles had a big get-together in Jerusalem basically reiterating the same thing. Maybe the letter they sent out only applied to the gentile converts? I.e., the gentile converts get a pass and don’t have to follow the law of Moses except for the 4 things specifically mentioned, but the Jews still have to follow it? Or maybe it’s an optional thing, where the Jews can follow it if they want, but aren’t required to? The elders also mentioned that the Jews were also dumping all the old traditions/customs along with the law, and gave the impression of being worried about losing their culture more than about following specific portions of the law.

To be honest I’m starting to get a little impatient with the whole thing and just want everybody to get on the same page already. Basically the takeaway here is that the law is a HUGE deal to the Jews, and so even though the whole follow-the-law-or-not-follow-the-law thing should have been wrapped up chapters and chapters and ages and ages ago, the controversy is still going strong. And probably will be for a while. Sigh.

According to the notes, there was a false prophet in Egypt a few years prior to the events in this chapter, described by the historian Josephus. Supposedly the leader led 4,000 followers to the Mount of Olives outside Jerusalem – for what purpose, the notes don’t say (an attack on Jerusalem, maybe?) – and the Roman soldiers had killed hundreds of them. The leader had escaped, though.

We established back in Acts 12 that after Pontius Pilate, the Roman-ruled portion of Judea was governed by a string of governors, most of whom were weak and useless. The fact that the Roman legionaries are so prompt and effective here indicates that whoever is currently ruling was one of the few strong governors. Back during the death of Stephen, the Roman governor was weak and incompetent, and the Jews were able to kill Stephen with impunity. Paul gets very lucky here, because had the current Roman leader been as weak as that one (and as weak as most of them were in the post-Pilate years), he would probably have ended up killed by the Jewish mob just like Stephen, and not had anyone to save him.

Leave a comment

Filed under Acts, New Testament

Acts Chapter 20

What Happens:

Paul leaves Ephesus and travels through Macedonia to Greece. He stays in Greece for three months and then decides to sail back to Syria. However, some antagonistic Jews interfere with his sailing plans so he decides to travel overland instead. He is accompanied by Sopater from Berea, Aristarchus and Secundus from Thessalonica, Gaius from Derbe, Timothy, and Tychicus and Trophimus from the area around Ephesus. The group heads to Troas, where they are joined by Luke after Passover.

At Troas Paul speaks at length to the believers there. Knowing he’s going to be leaving the next day, he talks long into the night. Eutychus, one of the people listening, is propped up comfortably in an open window, and as Paul drones on he starts to nod off. He falls asleep, and falls out the window. The gathering is on the third story, and when they rush to the ground floor they find Eutychus dead. Paul throws himself on Eutychus, puts his arms around him, and says, “Don’t be alarmed. He’s alive!” The revived Eutychus and the rest of the group go back inside, get something to eat, and Paul continues talking until morning. In the morning Eutychus and the others go home. Paul’s traveling companions sail to Assos, while Paul heads on foot there.

At Assos Paul rejoins his group, and they sail to Mitylene, then Chios, then Samos, and finally arrive at Miletus. Paul wants to skip going to Ephesus because he’s in a hurry to get to Jerusalem as quickly as possible, preferably before Pentecost. At Miletus, Paul sends for the elders of the church at Ephesus.

When they arrive, he says to them: “You know how I lived the whole time I was with you, from the first day I came into the province […] I served the Lord with great humility and with tears and in the midst of severe testing by the plots of my Jewish opponents. You know that I have not hesitated to preach anything that would be helpful to you but have taught you publicly and from house to house. I have declared to both Jews and Greeks that they must turn to God in repentance and have faith in our Lord Jesus.”

“And now,” he continues, “compelled by the Spirit, I am going to Jerusalem, not knowing what will happen to me there. I only know that in every city the Holy Spirit warns me that prison and hardships are facing me. However, I consider my life worth nothing to me; my only aim is to finish the race and complete the task the Lord Jesus has given me—the task of testifying to the good news of God’s grace.”

He tells them that he knows that none of them will ever see him again, and that he is no longer responsible for them; he has taught them everything he could. “Keep watch over yourselves and all the flock of which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers,” he tells them. “Be shepherds of the church of God, which he bought with his own blood. I know that after I leave, savage wolves will come in among you and will not spare the flock. Even from your own number men will arise and distort the truth in order to draw away disciples after them. So be on your guard! Remember that for three years I never stopped warning each of you night and day with tears.”

Paul concludes by saying that he now commits them to God’s grace. He reminds the Ephesian leaders that in the time he was with them he never coveted anyone’s gold or riches, had supplied all his own needs, and helped many other people. This should be an example for them to follow, he says. “In everything I did, I showed you that by this kind of hard work we must help the weak, remembering the words the Lord Jesus himself said: ‘It is more blessed to give than to receive.’ ”

After his farewell speech, he kneels down with them and prays. They cry and hug him, deeply saddened by his statement that they will never see him again, and accompany him to his ship.

Commentary:

Ok, seriously, if I were giving a talk and someone got so bored that they fell asleep, and fell out a window, and died…… and then by some great miracle they actually managed to be REVIVED…. my speech would be over. Do not pass go, do not collect 200 drachmas, speech is over, we’re done. But Paul isn’t going to let some minor interruption like a death and a resurrection faze him. And Eutychus! Eutychus gets up, GETS A SNACK, and carries on like nothing ever happened. He even listens to the rest of Paul’s talk! Without, evidently, dying of boredom a second time.

Re: the elders of the church of Ephesus. Back in Acts 14, Luke mentioned that Paul and Barnabas had been appointing groups of elders to lead each city’s christian community, and clearly they’ve been continuing the pattern in later travels. It makes sense that since Paul didn’t have enough time to physically visit the city of Ephesus that he would still want to talk to the leaders there. Miletus is about 50 miles south of Ephesus, so it would have been something of a journey for them.

Why won’t Paul ever see the Ephesians again? It’s clear that he intends to travel and preach a good deal more – for the rest of his life, by the sound of it – but why would that prevent him from returning to Ephesus? You’d think Ephesus, being a large city located at a midway point between Judea and Greece, would be an ideal hub to use to continue to expand Jesus’ message throughout Greece and Asia Minor. But apparently that’s not going to be Paul’s strategy. To use a military analogy, when an army is invading somewhere they usually send reconnaissance units in first: light, highly mobile units to secure strategic locations before the main army then rolls in to consolidate power. Paul here is like the recon unit, blazing the trail ahead of everyone else as he blitzes from city to city establishing small communities, often at considerable personal danger.

But there’s no real army to follow up behind him and consolidate his wins – there’s undoubtedly more missionaries out there, such as Barnabas and Mark, but not near enough – so Paul is basically creating his own forces as he goes. Instead of Paul sticking around in Asia Minor to continue to spread the word even more throughout the region, he’s tasked the new leaders at Ephesus with that job, while he blazes ahead, opening up ever more new territory. He’s heading back to Jerusalem right now (not sure why, since he was just there not too long ago, but maybe we’ll find out next chapter). But his stated goal is to get to Rome. (Acts 19) We know Rome already has a Christian community, or rather HAD one, since they were banished from Rome by Emperor Claudius. (Acts 18, wiki) Perhaps his goal is to re-establish the christian community there. Perhaps he has a foreboding of his death when he gets there, since Paul was executed in Rome in 67AD, and that’s why he’s so certain that he’ll never see the Ephesians again.

I’m also curious: what are the Apostles doing, back in Jerusalem? Anything? They’ve been headquartered there since the resurrection, and as far as I can tell none of the twelve have left, so are they preaching only in Jerusalem? Maybe expanding locally around Judea? Have any of them struck out for other territories (the message has spread all the way down to Egypt, so somebody must have gone down there, if not an apostle), or are they staying put in Jerusalem so that they can lead the Church (capital-C “Church” in the broader sense of “all christians everywhere”, not just the lower-case c “church” of the local christian community in their town)?

I have to say, we haven’t seen much leadership coming out of the Apostles lately. I know our text here has only been following Paul and that anything the Apostles have done is of course not recorded in it, but there’s still the fact that Paul is out here in these largish, if new, christian communities, and there’s no mention at all of the Apostles having any involvement whatsoever. Acts never writes about Paul, say, getting a letter from one of the Apostles while on his missionary trips, or of the Apostles sending someone out to these new places to help out, or to check on things. Of course, it’s possible that these new communities are simply so new, and 1st-century communication is simply so slow, that the Apostles are planning to do such things later, but right now it’s simply too soon for them to have been able to. I’m frustrated by the lack of knowledge of the Big Picture: We know what Paul is doing, but nothing about anyone else. The dearth of information is so complete that it’s almost like Paul is the only one out there, and everyone else has fallen off the planet.

Re: “It is more blessed to give than to receive.” This saying of Jesus’ is not recorded anywhere in the gospels. It is also not an Old Testament phrase that Jesus might simply have re-quoted. The Apostle John wrote that Jesus did many things not recorded in the gospels (John 21); if this phrase is something that Jesus really said, then this is the only place it’s recorded in the Bible.

Leave a comment

Filed under Acts, New Testament

Acts Chapter 19

What Happens:

While Apollos is at Corinth (Acts 18) in Greece, Paul travels overland back to Ephesus, on the western edge of Turkey. He talks to some of the christians there and asks them if they received the Holy Spirit when they were baptized. They reply that they don’t know what the Holy Spirit is, but they received “John’s baptism”, i.e. one of water. Paul tells them, “John’s baptism was a baptism of repentance. He told the people to believe in the one coming after him, that is, in Jesus.” He re-baptizes them in the name of Jesus, and when he does they receive the Holy Spirit and begin to “speak in tongues” and prophesy.

Paul preaches in the synagogue for three months, arguing persuasively about the kingdom of God. Some of the Jews are very resistant to his message, and publicly malign “the Way”, i.e. Christianity. Paul leaves the angry Jews, and takes some of his followers to a lecture hall owned by a teacher named Tyrannus. Paul has daily discussions in the lecture hall for two years, until practically everyone in the province has heard his message.

While Paul is in Ephesus, God does extraordinary miracles through him. Handkerchiefs and napkins that have touched Paul are taken to the sick and their illnesses are cured. Seven sons of a Jewish chief priest start going around trying to drive out evil spirits in the name of Jesus. They tell the demons, “In the name of the Jesus whom Paul preaches, I command you to come out.” One day an evil spirit actually answers them: “Jesus I know, and Paul I know about, but who are you?” Then the man possessed by the demon jumps up and beats all of them within an inch of their lives until they manage to escape and run away.

Both Jews and Greeks hear about this incident and get afraid, and start treating Jesus’ name with a lot more respect. Many people believe in Paul’s message, and openly confess their sins. A number of people who had practiced sorcery bring their magic scrolls and burn them publicly. When they calculate the value of the scrolls, the total comes to fifty thousand drachmas.

Paul decides he wants to briefly journey through Greece and Macedonia, before heading on to Jerusalem. Ultimately, he wants to go to Rome. He sends two of his helpers, Timothy and Erastus, on to Macedonia ahead of him, while Paul stays in Ephesus a little longer. Meanwhile, the Ephesian silversmiths make most of their money from crafting silver shrines of Artemis. One of the smiths, Demetrius, calls the other craftsmen together and gives a brief speech criticizing Paul: “You know, my friends, that we receive a good income from this business. And you see and hear how this fellow Paul has convinced and led astray large numbers of people here in Ephesus …  He says that gods made by human hands are no gods at all. There is danger not only that our trade will lose its good name, but also that the temple of the great goddess Artemis will be discredited; and the goddess herself, who is worshiped throughout the province of Asia and the world, will be robbed of her divine majesty.” The crowd of craftsmen starts chanting, “Great is Artemis of the Ephesians!”

Soon, the whole city is in an uproar. A mob seizes two of Paul’s friends, Gaius and Aristarchus, and carry them off to the theater building. Paul wants to go speak to the crowd, his other friends won’t let him. Some of the provincial officials, who are also friends of Paul, send him a message begging him not to go. In the theater, a roiling crowd has assembled. The place is noisy and full of shouts, and some people don’t even know why they’re there. The Jews push one of their own, a man named Alexander, to the stage to speak. He motions the crowd to silence in order to begin his defense, but the when the crowd realizes he’s Jewish they shout him down and spend the next two hours chanting, “Great is Artemis of the Ephesians!”

A city clerk finally manages to calm everyone down. “Fellow Ephesians, doesn’t all the world know that the city of Ephesus is the guardian of the temple of the great Artemis and of her image, which fell from heaven?” he says. “Therefore, since these facts are undeniable, you ought to calm down and not do anything rash. You have brought these men here, though they have neither robbed temples nor blasphemed our goddess. If, then, Demetrius and his fellow craftsmen have a grievance against anybody, the courts are open and there are proconsuls. They can press charges.  … As it is, we are in danger of being charged with rioting because of what happened today.” After he’s done speaking, the crowd breaks up and leaves.

Commentary:

I’m a little confused about the baptism business; specifically, what exactly it means to be “baptized with the Holy Spirit”. Apparently the Ephesian group’s original baptism was in water, but not in Jesus’ name. Was it in anyone’s name? John’s, maybe? Their second baptism with Paul was presumably also with water, but done in Jesus’ name. This time, now that they’re baptized in Jesus’ name, they receive the Holy Spirit. And apparently then become able to “speak in tongues” and give prophecies. “Speaking in tongues” can mean either speaking gibberish or speaking in real, foreign, languages, depending on who you ask. Back in Acts 2 it meant getting the ability to spontaneously speak foreign languages in order to more easily tell the message to foreigners, so that’s probably what it means here as well. I suspect the “speaking random gibberish” interpretation of “speaking in tongues” (“tongues” meaning “languages” in old-timey English anyway) was invented in modern times, because it’s a lot easier to fake speaking spontaneous gibberish than it is to fake knowledge of, say, Spanish. But that’s just me. As for the prophesies that they’re also supposed to be able to give now, who knows. The sudden onset of “powers” or spiritual activity from the Holy Spirit is implied to be a short-term thing; i.e., they get a sudden burst of ability to do this stuff but it quickly fades, it’s not a life-long ability.

Also, is everyone supposed to get these sudden (if temporary) spiritual powers when they get baptized? Because I was baptized back when I was like 10, and I didn’t get any of these powers. My baptism followed the “in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit” formula that Jesus said to use in Matthew 28, so the HS was definitely included in there. But, no powers. 😦 Does that mean my baptism was faulty? If the absence of sudden spiritual powers indicates a faulty baptism, then wouldn’t most people’s baptisms be faulty, since no one I’ve ever seen has gotten any sudden ability to prophesy or whatever after being baptized? OTOH, it’s also possible that receiving the Holy Spirit via baptism doesn’t automatically mean you get spiritual powers like the Ephesians here; they could be the exception. Perhaps most people don’t get spontaneous abilities to speak in other languages and such, even though their baptism is totally valid, and the Holy Spirit just falls on them a little more quietly. Maybe the HS only falls on people “loudly”, so to speak, and grants exceptional (temporary) spiritual powers only on rare occasions when God is trying to make a point. Or, maybe I’m overthinking this. On to other things!

Can you imagine having a teacher named Tyrannus? Kinda reminds me of my high school English teacher. Yowza.

Re: the seven dumb sons who get their butts kicked by a demon. I hate to almost side with a demon here, but I can’t help but feel that those guys got exactly what they deserved. It’s foolish to go messing around with demons when you have no idea what you’re doing, especially if you’re treating it almost like a game like these guys were doing. They’re lucky they got off with just a good butt-kicking, and didn’t wind up getting demon-possessed themselves. Also, it’s interesting that the demon knew Paul’s name, and evidently had some respect for it.

Re: people confessing their sins. I guess it’s necessary to confess them first before you can repent of them. The Catholics still have a confession/repentance ritual that everyone is supposed to do every so often, but it involves *privately* confessing your sins to a single person (the priest), rather than publicly telling your sins to all and sundry. Personally, I’d much rather do it privately.

Re: the magic scrolls. On the one hand, I’m always sad to see any books (or scrolls) destroyed. But on the other hand, if there’s no such thing as demons, evil spirits, etc., then all the “knowledge” in those scrolls was bunk anyway. In that case, burning them would be about equivalent to burning a couple hundred copies of Birdemic: Shock and Terror. Nothing worth shedding a tear over. On the flipside, if demons are real, and the Ephesians and bible-folk in general obviously believed that they were, then knowledge of how to contact or manipulate them would be considered very dangerous. In that case it would be more similar to having manuals for how to build nuclear warheads just out and about in everyday circulation. Is any knowledge “too dangerous” to let exist? Personally I lean towards “no”, but I can see why in some cases you might want to severely curtail access to certain knowledge, such as “how to build nuclear reactors”, “how to breed and disseminate Yersinia Pestis”, “how to contact malignant, powerful supernatural forces who fyi are evil”, etc. From a historical standpoint it would have been sort of cool to be able to see what they believed back then, as far as “magic scrolls”, but to be honest I mostly don’t care. Given how self-serving and foolish all the sorcerers we’ve met so far have been (remember Elymas? the seven sons here in Acts aren’t exactly Mensa material, either), I highly doubt that they really possessed any worthwhile information about their art. It’s also important to note that Paul didn’t make them burn their scrolls, they decided to do so on their own.

Also, according to the notes a drachma was about a day’s wages. In modern money, if we estimate a day’s wages to be $7.25 minimum wage * 8 hours = $58 for a day’s wages, then 50,000 drachmas = 50,000 days’ wages, or 50,000 * $58 = $2.9 million. That’s just ridiculous, really; who on earth has $3 million worth of any type of book, let alone $3 million of magic books? I’m a little skeptical of the notes’ statement that a drachma was about equivalent to a day’s wages. Of course, my conversion into modern money is also highly unscientific and probably wrong. But either way you slice it, fifty thousand silver coins is a ton of money. The notes say that the books were highly expensive not because of their quality, but because of the power that they supposedly granted the owner. So instead of being a pile of, say, fifty thousand cheap 1-drachma scrolls, it would more likely have been a smaller pile with a few hundred very expensive scrolls. One wonders who made these scrolls, and how popular the practice of magic must have been for there to be so many of them. Or, could these have been scrolls about practices, rituals etc of other gods, that the christian Luke just lumped in as “magic” in his description.

Anyways, I’m way overthinking this again. Long story short, the more mystical residents of Ephesus were clearly impressed enough by Paul that they were willing to sacrifice thousands of pieces of silver’s worth of stuff to join him.

Re Paul’s helper Timothy, this is probably the same Timothy who travelled around with Paul on Paul’s first journey and went off to Corinth with Silas last chapter. The city of Ephesus was home to the Temple of Artemis, one of the Seven Wonders of the ancient world. The famous temple was a giant tourist draw, and many of Ephesus’ craftsmen made a tidy living selling trinkets, jewelry, etc of Artemis to tourists. If Artemis followers start dumping Artemis for Jesus, the tourist trade based on the Temple of Artemis would dry up. They could switch over to selling Jesus trinkets instead of pagan trinkets, but without the Temple the big tourist draw would be gone. Plus it seems like at least some of them have a genuine devotion to Artemis, and are driven by more idealistic than monetary reasons.

The Jews didn’t worship Artemis any more than the Christians did, which is why when the Jewish Alexander tried to speak to the mob they quickly shut him down. The text’s wording is a little vague when it says that Alexander was speaking “in defense”, but it seems that he must have actually been about to defend Paul. Which is quite surprising given that the Jews have been mostly antagonistic towards Paul. The enemy of my enemy is my friend, I guess.

Leave a comment

Filed under Acts, New Testament

Acts Chapter 18

What Happens:

Paul leaves Athens and heads to Corinth, 50 miles to the west, where he meets a Jew named Aquila. Aquila and his wife Priscilla recently moved to Corinth from Italy, because Emperor Claudius banned all Jews from Rome. Paul is a tentmaker just like them, so he stays with them, and every Sabbath goes to the synagogue to try and persuade Jews and Greeks over to Christianity.

Silas and Timothy finally rejoin Paul (they had been separated after the group had been driven out of Berea by angry Jews (Acts 17)). Paul devotes himself wholeheartedly to trying to convince the Jews at the synagogue that Jesus is the Messiah. The Jews become antagonistic and then abusive, and finally Paul gets fed up with them entirely. “Your blood be on your own heads!” he shouts angrily. “I am innocent of it. From now on I will go to the Gentiles.” Paul leaves the synagogue and goes next door to the house of Titius Justus, a gentile. Titius believes in God and attends the synagogue, but has not converted to Judaism. The synagogue ruler, a man named Crispus, believes Paul’s message; he and a large number of other Corinthians believe and get baptized.

One night, Paul has a vision of Jesus. Jesus tells him not to be afraid, and to keep on speaking. He reassures Paul that he is with him and that no one will hurt him, because Jesus has many people in this city. Paul decides to stay in Corinth for a year and a half, teaching the word of God. Meanwhile, the Corinthian Jews who are antagonistic towards Paul unite against him and haul him in front of the Roman governor, Gallio, and accuse Paul of teaching people to worship in ways that are contrary to the law. Gallio interrupts them before Paul can defend himself, and says that he doesn’t care. It’s not like Paul has committed a real crime, Gallio tells them, since he hasn’t broken any Roman laws, just Jewish ones; and if the Jews have a problem with him they can deal with it themselves. He sends them away, and when the Jews leave the court they turn on the synagogue leader Sosthenes and beat him while Gallio ignores them.

Eventually Paul leaves Corinth, and he, Aquila, and Priscilla set sail for Syria. Before they go, Paul stops in the port town of Cenchreae, 4 miles south of Corinth, and cuts his hair in fulfillment of a vow. On their way to Syria, the trio stops at the city of Ephesus, on the eastern coast of Turkey. Paul goes to the synagogue and teaches there, and the Jews are interested enough in his message that they ask him to stay longer. Paul declines, but says that he will return someday if it is God’s will, and leaves Priscilla and Aquila with them before sailing on to Judea. Paul visits the church in Jerusalem, and then heads to Antioch, in Syria. He stays a while in Antioch, and then heads off to Galatia and Phrygia, in Turkey, to strengthen the churches there.

Meanwhile, a Jew from Alexandria named Apollos comes to Ephesus. He is an educated man with a thorough knowledge of the Scriptures, and despite only knowing the story of Jesus’ baptism teaches about Jesus both fervently and accurately. He begins to preach boldly in the synagogue, and when Priscilla and Aquila hear him they invite him to their house and teach him the full story of Jesus’ life. Apollos wants to go to Achaea, a region in central Greece, to spread the message, and the brothers and sisters in the church in Ephesus encourage him to do so. When Apollos arrives in Achaea he is a great boon to the community of Christians already there, because he can effectively refute Jewish opponents in public debate, and uses his education in the Scriptures to prove that Jesus is the Messiah.

Commentary:

The notes say that Emperor Claudius, who ruled from 41 to 54AD, banned Jews and Christians (the latter of whom were still seen by Romans as just a sub-sect of the former) from Rome because of “continual tumults” and civil unrest caused by them. Neither the notes nor Acts tell what “tumults” there may have been. It’s possible that when the first Christians arrived in Rome (remember, Paul isn’t the only missionary out there, just the most famous), that they got into conflicts with the existing population of Jews, and the Romans, unable to distinguish Jew from Christian (and probably not caring very much anyway), just decided to boot them all. (wiki)

Something that’s interesting, and that I had never thought about before, is that other religions besides just Judaism/Christianity also came in for some suppression by the Romans. The followers of Dionysus, who were known for throwing wild drunken orgies called Bacchanalia, had their religion banned in 186BC, with death penalties for anyone who was a priest, leader, or participant. The historian Livy wrote that there were more executions than imprisonments. (wiki)

The religion of the Druids was also suppressed, and then banned. The druids weren’t confined to Ireland, as a modern person might think; druidism was also the religion of the Gauls, who occupied modern-day France and were conquered by Julius Caesar in 58BC. Their rituals involved human sacrifices, which the Romans found barbaric. (Which is both hypocritical and hilarious, given the Romans’ gladiator fetish.) Druidic rites were first suppressed by Emperor Augustus (who ruled from 27BC to 14AD), and finally forbidden completely by Emperor Claudius in 54AD. This chapter of Acts takes place right around 51AD, so the ban on druidism is roughly contemporaneous with Claudius’ expulsion of the Jews/Christians from Rome. (wiki)

Anyways! Back to our regularly scheduled chapter. Apparently Paul is a tentmaker. I thought he was rich, and that being a Pharisee he basically taught the Torah for a living? According to the notes, it was Jewish custom to provide training in a trade to all sons, even in rich families. If that’s true, then evidently Paul’s family taught him tentmaking (or more likely, apprenticed him to a tentmaker) when he was young.

So, Paul finally gets fed up with the Jews. Personally, I’ve been tired of them for a while, and if I were Paul, I would have told them all to go to hell after the incident in Lystra, where they kind of tried to stone him to death. Clearly, Paul has a lot more forbearance and tolerance than I do (more than most people, I expect. Would YOU keep trying to help a group that tried to stone you to death?) But now, even the ever-patient Paul has finally reached his limit. It’s not clear whether he means that he’s only going to preach to the gentiles from now on forever, or if he means only in this one town. I guess we’ll see, although he did preach in the synagogue in Ephesus. It’s not clear if Titius Justus converted to christianity, but the implication was that he did.

The purpose of Jesus’ unexpected appearance to Paul seems to be mainly to comfort him. The town seemed potentially on the point of breaking out into violence against Paul, like so many of the other towns before it; Luke writes of the people’s “abusiveness” toward Paul, which was severe and blatant enough to trigger an unprecedented outburst of rage from Paul. Paul probably regretted this sudden outburst of temper later; writing off entire segments of the population isn’t really in his normally patient nature, and this whole episode was probably very discouraging for him. Paul never got a comforting vision after the stoning incident at Lystra, and the fact that he got one now points to the fact that although physically he might not have been harmed in Corinth, emotionally and spiritually he’s feeling very down and disheartened.

There’s no telling who Sosthenes is; the synagogue ruler at the beginning of the chapter was Crispus, who left the synagogue and joined Paul when Paul left. It looks like Sosthenes must have been his replacement, but it also looks like Sosthenes was pro-Paul if the others decided to beat him after Paul’s failed trial. (Why didn’t they beat Paul?) And why would they elect a pro-Paul leader anyway, since they’re very anti-Paul? Unless, Sosthenes isn’t a supporter of Paul at all, but was only beaten for failing to get Gallio to carry out the trial.

Paul never says what his vow was that required him to cut off his hair; it would be interesting to know what it was. The port of Cenchreae still exists today.

From what I understand, the Apostles are still headquartered in Jerusalem at this point, so Paul must have spoken with them when he went to visit the christian community there. It’s also important to remember that although in English “the church” can refer to either the place or the people, and usually just the place, in the Bible it always refers to the people. When Paul “visits a church”, he isn’t going off to look at a building, he means that he’s visiting the christian community, the church body.

It’s interesting how quickly Christianity is spreading. At the beginning of Acts, the only Christians were the Apostles and a handful of Jesus’ other followers who hadn’t run away after the crucifixion. In the first year or two after Jesus’ ascent, the only Christians out there had been recruited either directly by Jesus, or by the Apostles. It was noteworthy back in Acts 9 when for the first time Peter met a Christian who had been recruited by someone other than Jesus, himself, or another apostle. It’s interesting that that meeting became the catalyst for Peter’s vision that showed him that everybody should be able to follow Jesus, not just Jews (i.e. that a person didn’t have to become Jewish to become Christian). Anyway, thanks to the various waves of missionary work in the years afterwards, we now see christians like Apollos, just out and about in everyday life. They show up out of the blue in places that supposedly no christian missionaries have even been to yet; as far as I can tell, the visit by Paul (and Priscilla and Aquila) to Ephesus was the first time Acts mentions any christians there. Apollos was from Alexandria in Egypt, so it looks like the christian message has really been getting around. Even if Apollos did only know partial information about Jesus’ life. I’m curious what other missionaries are out there (and how many), because we know Paul isn’t the only one. Barnabas and Mark were heading to Cyprus the last time we saw them back in Acts 15, which was probably two to three years ago in in-story chronology. Philip was off preaching in Samaria, the last time we saw him back in Acts 9… which was probably nine or ten years ago. (Acts started in 33AD and we know that Acts 11 takes place in 44AD, so on average each chapter seems to be covering about 1 year.) There’s no word on any of the others. Where are Silas and Timothy? They rejoined Paul in Corinth, but it seems that Paul did not take the pair with him when he continued on to Ephesus. Did they stay in Corinth, or did they continue on to other places to continue preaching?

I lament that we don’t have any information on what anyone besides Paul is doing throughout this missionary phase. If only the other disciples had had the foresight to write down their travels so that people such as myself could read about it later! Good thing Paul had Luke with him to write down all of his journeys. Speaking of which, where has Luke gone? We last saw him in Philippi in Acts 16, which was probably about two years ago in the in-story timeline, and haven’t seen him since, although it’s obvious he must meet with Paul again later in order to get all this info to write down in the first place. I guess we’ll see if he turns up again in later chapters. Anyways, I’m still curious why none of the other missionaries out there wrote down their stories. Or did they, and the accounts have just failed to survive?

Leave a comment

Filed under Acts, New Testament

Acts Chapter 17

What Happens:

Paul and his group travel through Amphipolis and Apollonia in Macedonia, arriving at the city of Thessalonica. Thessalonica is large enough to have a Jewish population, so, following his usual routine, Paul goes to the synagogue on the Sabbath and begins telling the Jews about Jesus. Over the course of three Sabbaths he explains to them Jesus’ life, resurrection, and fulfillment of various prophecies, and at the end he declares that Jesus is the Messiah. Some of the Jews are convinced and become believers, including a large number of non-Jews who worship God, and a number of prominent women.

So many Jews join Paul that the remaining Jews start to get jealous, and they round up some local hooligans from the market and use them to start a riot in the city. Paul has been staying with a Greek named Jason, and the ringleader Jews rush to Jason’s house hoping that Paul and Silas are there. However, no one is home except Jason and a few other believers, so the Jews grab them and drag them down to the city officials. The leaders of the engineered riot exclaim, “These men who have caused trouble all over the world have now come here, and Jason has welcomed them into his house. They are all defying Caesar’s decrees, saying that there is another king, one called Jesus.” The crowd roils at hearing this, and the city officials aren’t sure what to believe. They make Jason and the others post bond, and then let them go.

Paul and Silas leave for Berea, a city 30 miles west. Following his usual preaching routine, he heads to the synagogue and begins teaching about Jesus. The Bereans are “of more noble character” than the Thessalonians, and they receive Paul’s message enthusiastically. Many of the Jews convert, along with some prominent Greek women and men. They study the scriptures every day to learn more about what Paul has been saying. However, when the Jews back in Thessalonica hear about this, they send some people to Berea to agitate the city and stir things up. The new believers in Berea send Paul to Athens, but Silas and Timothy stay in Berea for now, and plan to join Paul later.

While Paul is waiting for Timothy and Silas in Athens, he becomes distressed at the innumerable idols throughout the city. He goes to the synagogue and the marketplace and reasons with the Jews and the greek worshipers of God, about Jesus. At the marketplace a group of Epicurean and Stoic philosophers begin to dispute his claims, calling him a “babbler”. They take him to a meeting of the Areopagus and ask him to explain all these new ideas he’s bringing in, philosophy and endless debate over the newest ideas being the favorite pastime of most everyone in Athens.

Paul gives a speech: “People of Athens! I see that in every way you are very religious. For as I walked around and looked carefully at your objects of worship, I even found an altar with this inscription: TO AN UNKNOWN GOD. So you are ignorant of the very thing you worship—and this is what I am going to proclaim to you. The God who made the world and everything in it is the Lord of heaven and earth and does not live in temples built by human hands. … [H]e himself gives everyone life and breath and everything else. From one man he made all the nations, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he marked out their appointed times in history and the boundaries of their lands. God did this so that they would seek him and perhaps reach out for him and find him, though he is not far from any one of us.”

Paul quotes two Cretan and Cilician poets, one of whom said that people are God’s offspring. “Therefore since we are God’s offspring, we should not think that the divine being is like gold or silver or stone—an image made by human design and skill. In the past God overlooked such ignorance, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent. For he has set a day when he will judge the world with justice by the man he has appointed. He has given proof of this to everyone by raising him from the dead.”

Some of the listeners sneer at this speech, but many say they want Paul to come back and speak again on this subject, and a few become believers on the spot.

Commentary

Here we go again. (I think my first thought on reading the first paragraph of this chapter was a slightly incredulous, “This again? Really?”) We have basically a repeat of what seems to happen in almost every city Paul preaches in: Paul teaches about Jesus, some of the Jews like it and some don’t, the ones who don’t immediately get smitten with hate for Paul for stealing their influence, and then they either A) riot, B) stone them, or C) arrest them. (cf Acts 14, 15, and 16) This is also not the first time that resentful Jews have followed Paul & co to another town to continue their harassment. (see Acts 14.) I’m hoping we can break the cycle eventually (Paul’s got speech skills, maybe he can find a way to make the Jews who don’t want to join him less envious), but I’ve got a feeling it’s gonna be like this from here on out. At least they didn’t get stoned to death this time.

This chapter mentions Paul, Silas, and Timothy, but not Luke. Luke also refers to “them” as traveling, rather than “we”. It looks like Luke stayed behind in Philippi when the others left, at the end of the last chapter.

Also, here’s the map. Amphipolis, Appollonia, Thessalonica, and Berea are clustered at the top, and Athens is at the southeastern corner of Greece.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Areopagus refers to both a group of people and to the place where they met. “Areopagus” is Greek for Rock of Ares (Ares being the greek equivalent of the god Mars. The Romans called the place Mars Hill.) The place itself is near the Acropolis (home of the Parthenon, which was already 500 years old at that time) and consists of a giant lumpy boulder (the Rock of Ares), with a flat plaza-like space in front. The Areopagus council was an aristocratic council of Athens dating back to ancient times. It was powerful when Athens was its own city-state, but history is vague on what powers it retained after the Romans took over. The Romans divided their Empire into Senatorial Provinces, where the Senate picked the proconsuls who governed them, and Imperial Provinces, where only the Emperor could select the proconsuls. Most Imperial provinces were strategically located in border regions, or newly-conquered, unstable, or rebellious regions. Because the Senatorial provinces were by definition peaceful and stable, they had few or no legions stationed in them, so this arrangement also had the effect of keeping the legion-heavy provinces firmly under the control of the Emperor.

Anyway, Athens, part of the province of Achaea, was originally a Senatorial province. In AD15, the Emperor Tiberius made Athens (and Macedonia) Imperial Provinces, in response to complaints of Senatorial mismanagement. In AD44 Emperor Claudius returned them to Senatorial Province status again.

Fun Fact: One of the proconsuls of Athens was Gaius Calpurnius Piso, who was a Senator from c. 54AD to 65AD and led a conspiracy to murder the increasingly-crazy Emperor Nero. Paul’s journey here in Acts runs from about 49AD to 52AD, and Paul and Peter were both killed by Nero in 64AD.

Also, can Paul give a speech or what? I’m sure in real life he probably said a lot more stuff than just the sample that Luke wrote down in his book, but it’s not bad for basically an off-the-cuff speech given to some pushy philosophers. As a person who can barely speak in front of a group at all without messing it up horribly, I am suitably impressed.

Stoic philosophers believed in a deterministic universe, and that the definition of virtue was to keep one’s own will in line with the will of nature, i.e. fate. In practice this involved large amounts of fortitude and “accepting fate”. The Epicureans believed that pleasure is the highest good, and that freedom from fear and freedom from physical pain is the highest form of pleasure. They were more concerned with avoiding pain than with being hedonistic. It’s interesting that Paul was highly educated enough to be familiar with and able to quote the Cilician and Cretan poets.

2 Comments

Filed under Acts, New Testament

Acts Chapter 16

What Happens:

Paul and Silas head to Derbe and Lystra in southern Turkey, revisiting places where Paul and Barnabas had established local churches on their earlier mission trip. In Lystra there’s a convert named Timothy, whose mother is Jewish and whose father is Greek. Everyone in Lystra speaks very highly of Timothy, so Paul decides to recruit him to join he and Silas on their travels. Paul circumcises Timothy because of the Jews in that area, who all know that his father is greek. As they go from town to town they spread the news of the Apostles’ letter.

The trio travel through Galatia and Phrygia, but are prevented by the Holy Spirit from entering the province of Asia, on the eastern edge of Turkey. When they get to the border of Mysia, they try to enter Bithynia, but the Spirit of Jesus blocks them. They bypass the place and go to the city of Troas, on the coast, where they are joined by the disciple Luke. That night Paul has a vision of a Macedonian man begging Paul to come to Macedonia. Paul concludes that God is calling them to preach the gospel there, so they immediately set sail for the islands of Samothrace, in the Aegean sea between Turkey and Greece/Macedonia, and then to Neapolis, on the southern coast of Macedonia. From there they head a few miles west to Philippi, the biggest city in the region, and stay there several days.

That Sabbath, the four head to a nearby river to pray, and wind up talking to a group of women who are there. They begin to tell the message of Jesus. One of the women is a seller of purple cloth named Lydia, who is a worshiper of God. The Lord opens her heart to Paul’s message, and she and her family are baptized. She invites the group to stay at her family’s home, and they accept.

On another day, Paul, Luke, Timothy, and Silas are walking to the river, and encounter a slave girl who is possessed by a spirit by which she predicts the future. She makes a good deal of money for her owners by fortune telling. The girl follows Paul and the group around, shouting, “These men are servants of the Most High God, who are telling you the way to be saved.” She keeps this up for many days. Finally Paul gets so fed up that he wheels around and commands, “In the name of Jesus Christ I command you to come out of her!” and banishes the spirit from her.

The girl’s owners get quite angry because they won’t be able to make any money off her fortune-telling anymore, and they seize Paul and Silas and drag them to the authorities, claiming that the pair “are throwing our city into an uproar by advocating customs unlawful for us Romans to accept or practice.” The magistrates order Paul and Silas to be stripped and severely beaten, and afterwards they are put in prison. The jailer is commanded to watch them carefully, so he puts them in the innermost cell and chains their feet.

At midnight that night, Paul and Silas are praying and singing hymns while the other prisoners listen, when suddenly there is a violent earthquake. The foundation shakes, the prison doors open, and the chains in the walls come loose. The jailer wakes up and when he sees the prison door wide open he grabs his sword and prepares to kill himself, thinking that all the prisoners have escaped and that he will be executed. But Paul shouts to him, “Don’t harm yourself! We are all here!”

Shocked, the jailer calls for lights, and when he sees Paul and Silas there he falls before them and asks what he must do to be saved. They tell him, “Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved.” They explain the word of the Lord to him and his household. The jailer washes their wounds, and then he and his family get baptized. He fixes a meal for Paul and Silas, and is filled with joy because he and his family have come to believe in God.

When morning comes around, the magistrates tell the jailer to release Paul and Silas, and that they are free to “go in peace”. But Paul counters, “They beat us publicly without a trial, even though we are Roman citizens, and threw us into prison. And now do they want to get rid of us quietly? No! Let them come themselves and escort us out.” The magistrates get scared when they find out that Paul and Silas are Roman citizens. To appease them, they do what Paul wants and escort them from the prison, and, suddenly polite, request them to please leave the city. Paul and Silas go to Lydia’s house, where they meet “the brothers” and encourage them, before leaving Philippi.

Commentary

Paul has Timothy circumcised? Why? We just spent all of last chapter explaining why circumcision is no longer necessary, yet as soon as Paul leaves Antioch that’s the first thing he does? What’s the deal, and what does having neighboring Jews know his father was greek have anything to do with it?

According to the notes, Paul circumcised him “as a matter of expediency so that his work among the Jews might be more effective.” Not because either of them believed it was necessary for salvation. Apparently Paul’s thought process was that if they followed this particular law that the Jews believed was especially important, then they would have a better shot at converting them (especially since his father was greek and so Timothy must have extra faith to follow the Jewish tradition of circumcision.) My response to that is, how would the Jews ever know whether he’s circumcised or not? They would never know unless he told them. It’s not like they’re ever going to, uh, see for themselves. So I’m puzzled as to the actual usefulness of this.

Here is a map of Paul & Co.’s journey: They started the chapter in Derbe/Lystra (although this map shows them starting in Jerusalem, where they received the Apostles’ letter last chapter, and then headed to Antioch to deliver said letter, before heading to Derbe where we start in this chapter). They end the chapter in Philippi. Sorry for the tiny map.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The province of Asia that they were prevented from entering isn’t labelled, but would be the region in between Ephesus and Mysia. Bithynia and Mysia are neighboring provinces, although they’re shown kind of far apart on the map.

Not sure how the Holy Spirit would have kept them from entering. The notes suggest that it could have been through visions, through circumstance (I get mental images of Verin’s ta’veren-induced trip to Mat’s army (if you’re not a WoT fan, just ignore that)), simple good sense on the part of Paul & co. (e.g. seeing how crappy things were in certain places and deciding to take it as a sign that they should pass by, although Paul is so stubborn and gung-ho about preaching that I doubt he’d be deterred), or through other ways. Whatever it was, it was apparently intended to steer Paul & crew toward Macedonia, in keeping with Paul’s subsequent dream. Also, apparently the “Spirit of Jesus” is the Holy Spirit.

And also, apparently Luke joins them now. It never actually says in the text that Luke joins them; it only changes from saying that “they” (Paul, Silas, and Timothy) did stuff, to saying that “we” did stuff. Since Luke is the author of Acts, I take this to mean that he joined the group. To refresh our memory, Luke was a doctor and was either Greek, or, if Jewish, thoroughly Hellenized. He never knew Jesus and was recruited after Jesus’ Ascension. He wrote the gospel of Luke, and the book of Acts, probably sometime around 60AD, which would be about 10 years after the events of this chapter. This is… actually the first time that we’ve seen Luke. As far as I can tell, our only previous exposure to him was in the intro sections for Acts and the gospel of Luke. This is the first time we’ve seen him “in person”. It’s possible that this is where and when he was converted. Also, it turns out that yesterday was his feast day.

Philippi is named after Philip II, the father of Alexander the Great.

According to the notes about the group of women at the river, “There were so few Jews in Philippi that there was no synagogue (ten married men were required), so the Jews who were there met for prayer along the banks of the Gangites River. It was customary for such places of prayer to be located outdoors near running water.” However, if that’s what this was – Paul & co. stumbling across the city’s handful of Jews while out praying – why is no mention made of the men? I can understand if the women and men were segregated and the women went off to one place to pray and the men went off somewhere else, but I’m sure Paul, Silas, and the others would have wanted to talk to everybody they could find. Perhaps they did talk to the men, but were rejected, since it sometimes seems that women join the faith more easily than men do. That’s all assuming that these women were even Jewish anyway. Given how quickly they converted, I sort of doubt that they were, since Jews uniformly have been pretty negative to the christian message so far in Acts, irrespective of gender. It says that Lydia was a “worshiper of God”, which according to the notes means that she was a gentile who believed in the God of the Jews but had not become a full convert.

Not sure why only Paul and Silas were arrested, and not the whole group. Maybe because those two were the most senior.

If I were a prisoner, I don’t know that I’d have the self-control to NOT ESCAPE when the doors are wide open, the chains are literally falling out of the walls, and the jailer is so providentially asleep. I would have been out that door in five seconds flat, y’all. I can sort of see why maybe Paul and Silas wouldn’t, if they’ve got stuff still to do at the prison that they think is more important, but why not the other prisoners? Maybe there were more guards around after all, or something. Maybe some DID escape, but were low-value enough prisoners that nobody cared (firebrand revolutionaries like Paul are way higher on the scale of “people we want to keep in jail” than, say, some kid who shoplifted grapes at the market or whatever.) Anyway, I’m curious as to who actually baptized the jailer. (Who, incidentally, apparently lives either above the prison or right next door, seeing as how he’s got his whole family right there.) Surely he didn’t make Paul and Silas do it, since they were injured and he had just patched them up himself.

I have to admit that when I first read that Paul and Silas were Roman citizens, I was not terribly impressed. I was thinking of the US system where anybody who’s born inside the country is automatically a citizen, and assumed that the Roman system must have been the same or very similar, and if so, then any person (or at least, any man) born inside the Roman Empire must be a Roman citizen. How wrong I was! Turns out, the time period around Jesus’ birth was quite a period of upheaval, from a legal standpoint. The Roman Republic expanded rapidly in the second century BC – they started the century owning no land but Italy and Sicily, but after the Punic Wars with Carthage had conquered all of Carthage’s possessions in North Africa and Spain. In the middle of the second century they conquered Greece, Macedonia, and Pontus (in modern Turkey). In the middle of the first century BC, Julius Caesar conquered most of France, and Pompey conquered Judea and Syria. Over a dozen rebellions also took place during this time. Long story short, going from “just Italy” to “half of Europe” within such a short time span proved more pressure than the Republic could withstand, and after some sharp internal fighting Rome emerged as an Empire in 27BC, with Augustus as the first Emperor.

Back to our citizenship issues, when Rome first started expanding, the only people who were Roman citizens were people who were literally, uh, from Rome. When they conquered the rest of Italy, they did not change this definition. When they conquered Carthage and Spain they did not change this definition. When they conquered… well, you get the idea. Despite their vast territories, only a tiny fraction of the total population were Roman citizens. Their armies were mostly not-from-Rome (because obviously one city can only produce so many people, and you need hundreds of thousands of soldiers), and the Italian cities especially got angry about being denied citizenship. In true Roman fashion, they fought a war over it (the Social War in 91BC), and the Romans gave in and allowed the other Italian tribes to have full Roman citizenship.

Citizenship conferred a myriad of rights, including the right to vote (although in many cases you had to physically travel to Rome to exercise that right), the right to run for and hold public office, the right to have your children counted as citizens themselves, the right to a lawful trial, the right that if found guilty at trial, you could not be tortured or whipped, could not receive the death penalty for any crime other than treason, and could not be crucified as a form of execution. (wiki article) However, even though the other Italians got citizenship, hardly anyone else did. So all the newly conquered territories, such as Judea, were still not citizens.

However, even though their region didn’t get a blank check of universal citizenship like Italy did, it was still possible for individual people to earn citizenship in various ways. Service in the Roman Legions could earn you citizenship. The historian Josephus earned citizenship for serving the Emperor. Regional nobles and client kings were often granted citizenship. Also, there were various “lower” levels of citizenship as well. Even though very few people were full citizens, a larger number were eligible for “Latin Rights“, a sort of intermediate step between full citizenship and non-citizenship. It conferred almost all the rights of full citizenship except the right to vote, and it also allowed the right-holder to acquire full citizenship if they held municipal office. It was granted mostly to settlers, to encourage colonization of all Rome’s shiny new territories.

Anyways, long story short, the only way Paul could have been a citizen would be by individual grant – i.e. he or his parents had to have earned it – because the territory of Judea was not granted blanket citizenship, the way Italy was. In fact, Italy is pretty much the only place that was, so if you want to be BORN a Roman citizen, you have to be born in Italy. Period. Everyone else has to earn it on their own. Most likely, Paul’s parents earned citizenship, and Paul only inherited it. (He seems pretty young, and he’s spent most of his life studying the torah and all that, so he hasn’t really had much time to go off gallivanting with the Legion or whatever.) His parents could have earned it in a variety of ways: Legion service (unlikely, but you never know), service to the Republic (or Empire, depending whether it was before or after 27BC), or they could have been appointed it when Judea was conquered (which occurred in the 50’s BC, so it probably would have been Paul’s grandparents, making Paul a third-generation inheritor of citizenship.) Paul’s family is rich, and the Romans usually schmoozed the upper class so that they could use them as puppet-rulers to control the lower classes, so IMHO that’s the most likely way his citizenship came about. Either that, or he doesn’t actually have full citizenship, he only has the lesser (and easier to get) Latin Rights, but is passing himself off as a full citizen.

Re “the brothers”, I have no idea who that’s referring to, unless Lydia has some brothers. I don’t think Timothy and Luke are brothers.

Leave a comment

Filed under Acts, New Testament

Acts Chapter 15

What Happens:

Some believers from Judea come to Antioch and begin teaching the Christians there that they must be circumcised and follow “The law of Moses”, i.e. the traditional Jewish Old Testament laws, in order to be saved. Paul and Barnabas sharply disagree. To resolve the dispute, the believers in Antioch appoint a small group led by Paul and Barnabas to go to Jerusalem and see what the Apostles and elders have to say about this question. As they travel, Paul and Barnabas tell the other Antioch folks about all the gentiles they converted in Lystra, Perga, Pisidian Antioch, and all the other places they had visited during their earlier mission trip. (Acts 14) All the Antioch christians are very glad to hear this.

When the group arrives in Jerusalem, they are greeted by the church (i.e. the christian community), the elders, and the Apostles. Paul and Barnabas repeat their story of all the events of their evangelizing, which of course had recruited mostly gentiles to christianity. At hearing this, some former-Pharisee christians stand up and declare that, “The Gentiles must be circumcised and required to keep the law of Moses.” The apostles and elders discuss this issue amongst themselves, and after much discussion Peter gets up and delivers his opinion: “Brothers, you know that some time ago God made a choice among you that the Gentiles might hear from my lips the message of the gospel and believe. God, who knows the heart, showed that he accepted them by giving the Holy Spirit to them, just as he did to us. He did not discriminate between us and them, for he purified their hearts by faith. Now then, why do you try to test God by putting on the necks of Gentiles a yoke that neither we nor our ancestors have been able to bear? No! We believe it is through the grace of our Lord Jesus that we are saved, just as they are.”

Paul and Barnabas tell the assembly all the signs and wonders God had done amongst the gentiles through them. The apostle James stands and quotes an Old Testament prophecy which says that gentiles may seek the Lord equally with the Jews. “It is my judgment,” he concludes, “that we should not make it difficult for the Gentiles who are turning to God. Instead we should write to them, telling them to abstain from food polluted by idols, from sexual immorality, from the meat of strangled animals and from blood.”

The Apostles, elders, and church of Jerusalem choose two of their own men, Barsabbas and Silas, to return to Antioch with Paul and Barnabas. They also write the Antioch church a letter:

The apostles and elders, your brothers,

To the Gentile believers in Antioch, Syria and Cilicia:

Greetings. We have heard that some went out from us without our authorization and disturbed you, troubling your minds by what they said. So we all agreed to choose some men and send them to you with our dear friends Barnabas and Paul – men who have risked their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ. Therefore we are sending Judas and Silas to confirm by word of mouth what we are writing. It seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us not to burden you with anything beyond the following requirements: You are to abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood, from the meat of strangled animals and from sexual immorality. You will do well to avoid these things.

Farewell.

The group heads back to Antioch and presents the letter to the congregation, which receives it with a sigh of relief. The church is glad of the apostles’ letter, and Barsabbas’ and Silas’ encouragement further lifts their morale. At length, the pair decide to return to Jerusalem. Some time later, Paul and Barnabas decide to return to Lystra, Pisidian Antioch, and all the other places they had been to on their missionary trip, to check up on people and see how they’re doing. Barnabas wants to take the disciple Mark, but Paul doesn’t want to because they had taken Mark with them the first time and he had abandoned them in Pamphylia after a big argument. Barnabas takes Mark anyway and the two head to Cyprus, but Paul takes Silas and heads to Syria and Cilicia. They visit and strengthen the churches there.

Commentary

Seriously, bible people, I thought we were done with the whole Jewish-law-or-no-Jewish-law thing! Jesus abolished a few of the laws himself (the most major ones, such as dietary laws and sabbath restrictions), and Peter’s vision from God pretty much sealed the deal on all the OT laws being done for. A more unspoken thing here is that not only do the gentiles not have to follow Jewish law to be Christians, the Jews don’t have to follow Jewish law anymore either. Nobody does. But clearly, many of the Jewish converts have been continuing to follow it anyway. On the one hand I can’t blame them because you can’t really dump a lifetime of training in 5 minutes, but on the other hand, a significant fraction of them seem to enjoy dominating the new people with their whole holier-than-thou “I follow the laws better than you so I’m a better person than you!” mentality.

Also, evidently “being saved” is Biblespeak for “being able to go to heaven.” I’m sure everyone already knew that, but so many of these little phrases are just tossed into sermons and speeches and whatever under the assumption that everyone already knows what they mean, without ever being clearly defined. Also, in the last chapter “elders” referred to small councils of church leaders appointed by Paul and Barnabas in each town they set up a church in. Apparently there is a similar group of elders in Jerusalem, and probably in every town with a christian community.

Re the stuff about christians abstaining from “food polluted by idols”, sexual immorality, and “the meat of strangled animals and from blood”. I don’t have a paper bible with me to look at the notes, and sadly the online version doesn’t have the study notes part in it. However, according to google, the prohibition on eating food “polluted by idols” refers to eating animals that have been sacrificed to idols, i.e. to pagan gods. Not because there is necessarily anything wrong with the meat, but because eating idol sacrifices basically amounted to participating in the worship of that idol. Not sure what the whole strangled animals and blood thing is about, unless that refers to other pagan rituals. Maybe it was pagan practice to strangle the sacrificial animals to death or something. Alternatively, a theory I read on google said that it was a compromise to appease Jewish sensibilities: the gentile converts don’t have to follow full kosher, but to make the Jews feel more comfortable they should follow this one particular aspect of kosher, the ban on eating strangled animals and blood. Apparently the Jews felt especially strongly about this particular law of kosher because blood represented life or something and drinking it or eating a slaughtered animal whose blood hadn’t been drained (i.e. a strangled animal) was disrespectful bordering on blasphemous. So to chart something of a middle course the apostles confirmed that while the dietary laws no longer held, they would continue to follow this most central tenet to make the Jews feel better, which also helped reduce the potential divisiveness of their decision. Or So The Theory Goes. I have no idea what’s involved in pagan rituals and haven’t read the Old Testament yet, so I have no idea.

A google search for notes on what the “sexual immorality” part is all about turned up considerably less info. One theory (which I actually read in this book, which is a pretty great book and you should all read it) says that the abolition of OT laws abolished the rules-based laws, but not the morality laws. So legalese stuff about what kind of fabrics your clothes can be made of, how your food has to be cooked, how your beard has to be cut, etc are all abolished, but broad-scale moral issues such as “don’t kill”, “don’t steal” etc still stand. I like this idea, but it has a major problem in that there can easily be disagreement over which category a specific law falls into. But, if we roll with this theory, then basically the apostles’ letter is telling the Antioch christians that while the legalistic OT laws (like the majority of kosher) are no longer in effect, the broader moral edicts still stand, including the edicts about sexual behavior.

Or, this could be another reference to pagan practices; if pagan rituals involved sexual behavior, the apostles could simply be cautioning the Antioch folks against participating in said rituals (or engaging in behaviors that resemble it). Since most of the non-Jewish converts would in fact have converted to Christianity from pagan religions (most likely the Roman state religion, or local regional religions), the temptation to still occasionally hang out or do ceremonies or whatever with their old religious buddies who hadn’t converted could conceivably be pretty strong. As to what exact sexual behaviors are on the prohibited list, the letter never says. Adultery? Group sex? Gay sex? Masturbation? Divorce? There’s no telling. Also, even though the apostles’ letter is sent just to the christians at Antioch, it is addressed to the entire region and appears to be binding on all christians everywhere.

This is the first time we find out that the disciple Mark (author of the gospel of Mark and one of Jesus’ non-apostle followers during Jesus’ time on earth) had been with Paul and Barnabas on their first journey. I’m curious what their argument was about. By all appearances Paul doesn’t seem like he would be that easy of a person to get along with. He seems like a dominant, Type-A, my-way-or-the-highway kind of guy, and like he always wants to be in charge of everything. And the disciple Mark doesn’t seem super reliable or strong willed, given how he totally bailed on Jesus during Jesus’ arrest. But then again, all the other followers abandoned Jesus too, so Mark was hardly the only one. The end of the chapter says that Silas went back to Jerusalem with Barsabbas, but then says that Silas went to Syria with Paul. Either there were two different people both named Silas, or Silas went to Jerusalem but then returned to Antioch to go with Paul.

Leave a comment

Filed under Acts, New Testament